Gold Price $4152.94
TSX-V: AUMB
Last: 0.65
OTCQX: AUMBF
Last: 0.45
FRA: 2KY
Last: 0.42

True North Complex

As 1911 Gold’s flagship asset, the True North Complex is a key component of our overall corporate strategy to develop a district-scale gold exploration and mining operation around a centralized ore processing facility in the Rice Lake greenstone belt.

The True North Complex includes a modern, fully-permitted 1,350 tonnes per day processing facility, tailings management area and reprocessing operation, underground mine infrastructure (currently under temporary closure), and the True North Gold Deposit.

Site photo

Site Aerial View

Existing infrastructure at True North, combined with the high-grade mineral resource, provides a solid foundation on which to build a modern long-life mining and processing operation. The site also includes the necessary infrastructure to maintain operations, including all-season road access, grid hydroelectric power and broadband communications, as well as on-site maintenance shops, assay laboratory, warehouse, fuel storage facilities and administrative offices. The site also includes a 200-room camp facility, including kitchen, dining, recreation and fitness facilities.

The True North Complex is located adjacent to the town of Bissett on the north shore of Rice Lake, approximately 150 kilometres northeast of the capital city of Winnipeg, Manitoba. It is situated on mineral dispositions held 100% by the Company, comprising two contiguous Mineral Leases (ML63 and ML13433), totaling 1,092 hectares.

The original gold discovery in the Rice Lake district was made in 1911 by Duncan Twohearts, an indigenous trapper from the Sagkeeng First Nation, who identified an outcropping of vein quartz on the north shore of Rice Lake – the discovery outcrop for the True North Gold Deposit. Duncan Twohearts wrapped his find in a piece of blue denim, marking the first significant discovery of gold in the Province of Manitoba.

The original mining claim, named San Antonio, was staked on May 17, 1911, followed in August 1912 by the establishment of a small stamp mill on the adjacent Gabrielle mining claim – the first gold mill erected in Manitoba. Subsequent mine developments in the Rice Lake district took place in two main stages (1923–1968 and 1998–2017), with 23 zones eventually recording production, amounting to approximately 2.3 million ounces of gold.

Of historical note, the True North mine has produced more than 2 million ounces of gold over a mine life that has spanned close to 100 years, including 36 years of continuous production (1932–1968) from the historical San Antonio Gold Zone.

historical photo of the san Antonio mine

The True North Complex includes a modern, fully-permitted 1,300 tonnes-per-day ore processing facility, comprised of crushing, milling, centrifugal gravity concentration and flotation circuits. Concentrates from the gravity circuit are upgraded on a shaker table for direct-smelting, whereas flotation concentrates are reground, thickened and then leached in a three-stage leach circuit. Dissolved gold is recovered by six-stage carbon-in-pulp (CIP) circuit, followed by conventional pressure strip, electrowinning and smelting in an electric induction furnace. Gold is poured into doré bars and shipped to a refinery prior to being sold.

Detailed processing map

The original processing facility at the True North site, constructed in 1931–32, was destroyed by fire in 1980 and was subsequently reconstructed in 1996–97, with an operating capacity of 900 tonnes per day. Mill capacity was increased to 2,300 tonnes per day in 2011; however, it has since been scaled back to 1,300 tonnes per day. Additional crushing capability will return the plant to 2,300 tonnes per day capacity.

Current process plant recovery is name-plated at 93.5% based on a feed grade of 5.5 g/t Au, historically ranging up to 96–97% with higher feed grades from mined ore.

The TMF is located 1.6 kilometres northeast of the processing facility in an area naturally defined by bedrock ridges around the perimeter of a previously boggy area. It includes west and east impoundments, totaling 110 hectares in area, separated by a polishing pond 11 hectares in area. The current dikes and embankments were constructed in stages to industry standards, beginning in 1996, with the most recent expansion completed in 2014.

  • Tailings pumped from the processing plant to the TMF via pipeline
  • Transported as slurry (34% solids by weight)
  • East Tailings Management area expanded in 2015 (includes polishing pond, where water is then discharged as required)
  • Facility has remained in continual operation, including water discharge
  • Capacity in place for 2-3 years of operation - Permits in place to expand capacity as needed
  • No acid generation or deleterious elements - clean and good quality water

 

 

Scroll right to view more

Underground infrastructure at the True North Complex includes the ‘main’ (True North) mine, accessed via a 1,219-metre two-compartment shaft (A-shaft), originally brought into service in 1934 and subsequently deepened to its present depth in 1997. An internal winze (D-shaft) and ramp system extend the workings in the main mine to 1,675 metres vertical depth and are connected to A-shaft via a 1,400-metre-long tramway on Level 26 (1,190 metres). A-shaft is equipped with a modern headframe, dual-drum hoist and 4.5 tonne skip. Several ramp-access mines, including SG-1, Hinge and Cohiba, were developed between 2005 and 2010 on satellite deposits located northeast and east of the main mine.

Underground development at True North began over 100 years ago, when prospect shafts were sunk during the 1920’s and 1930’s on several gold showings, with the San Antonio (True North) mine being brought into commercial production. Elsewhere in the district, significant mine development and production took place between 1927 and 1951 at Central Manitoba, Gunnar and Ogama-Rockland, which have since been closed and partially reclaimed. Historically, shrinkage stoping was the principal mining method utilized in the district, although long-hole stoping and mechanized cut-and-fill were employed more recently at True North.

The True North Gold Deposit is a classical Archean orogenic gold deposit, consisting of quartz-carbonate vein systems hosted by brittle-ductile shear zones and faults in volcanic and sedimentary rocks (greenstones). The deposit is hosted by a north-younging, moderately inclined succession of volcanic and sedimentary rocks, belonging to the 2.73–2.72 Ga Gem assemblage. At Rice Lake, this assemblage includes volcanic sandstone and conglomerate, tholeiitic basalt flows and gabbro sills and dacitic volcaniclastic rocks, intruded by various felsic porphyry dikes.

The most important host for gold mineralization is a layered gabbro sill known as the San Antonio Mine unit (host to the main True North or Rice Lake deposit), but significant mineralization is also hosted by overlying basalt flows (007, 710-711 and SG1 deposits) and dacitic volcaniclastic rocks (Hinge and Cohiba deposits). The South Gabbro unit has not been drill tested. Orebodies within these deposits were accessed via the True North shaft and underground tramway, or from surface declines, the latter including the Hinge, 007 and SG1 declines.

An updated Mineral Resource Estimate for True North was produced in 2024, based on data from 3,157 surface and underground diamond drillholes (30,525 assay samples), and 30,202 channel sample strings from underground workings (114,756 assay samples). Wireframe models were constructed for 66 vein sets. Details on the methodology of the Mineral Resource Estimate can be found in the Technical Report dated December 23, 2024.

True North Underground Mineral Resources

Table 1: Mineral Resource Estimate Reported within 2.25 g/t Au Mineral Resource Constraining Envelopes

Category Tonnes Au opt Au g/t Au oz
Indicated 3,516,000 0.142 4.41 499,000
Inferred 5,490,000 0.117 3.65 644,000

Scroll right to view more

Note: Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability; there is no guarantee that all or any part of the Mineral Resource will be converted into Mineral Reserve.

Table 2: Block Model Sensitivity to Different Grade Thresholds within the 2.25 g/t Resource Constraining Envelopes

Sensitivity 

 

Gold Grade

Indicated Inferred
Tonnage Gold Grade Contained Gold Tonnage Gold Grade Contained Gold
(g/t) (t) (g/t) (oz) (t) (g/t) (oz)
2.00  2,781,000 5.23 468,000  4,852,000 3.96 618,000
2.25  2,530,000 5.54 451,000  4,404,000 4.14 587,000
2.50  2,255,000 5.93 430,000  3,754,000 4.45 537,000
3.00  1,751,000 6.85 386,000  2,726,000 5.10 447,000
3.50  1,368,000 7.86 346,000  2,031,000 5.75 375,000
4.00  1,093,000 8.91 313,000  1,527,000 6.42 315,000

Scroll right to view more

Note: The block tabulations included above do not constitute mineral resource estimates and are included to illustrate block grade sensitivity within the 2.25 g/t Au resource constraining envelopes

Figure: Block model - 3D Isometric View looking North

Cautionary Language with Respect to the True North PEA:
The preliminary economic assessment is preliminary in nature, includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the preliminary economic assessment will be realized.
While the Company has not made a production decision, should the Company make such a decision in the future without a feasibility study of mineral reserves, demonstrating economic and technical viability, there may be increased uncertainty of achieving any particular level of recovery of minerals or the cost of such recovery, including increased risks associated with developing a commercially mineable deposit. Historically, such projects have a much higher risk of economic and technical failure. There is no guarantee that the Company will make a production decision, and, if it does, there is no guarantee that any production will begin as anticipated or at all or that any anticipated production costs will be achieved. Failure to make a positive decision to commence production would have a material adverse impact on the Company's ability to generate revenue and cash flow to fund operations. Failure to achieve any anticipated production costs would have a material adverse impact on the Company's cash flow and future profitability.
The Company further cautions that the PEA is preliminary in nature. No mining study has been completed. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.

Stay up to date with our latest news: